🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Substantial Amount in Damages against Euroclear over Frozen Funds The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine. The Substantial Demand According to reports in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand. European Union officials will determine later this week regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs. Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves. Dispute on Ownership European Union authorities have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as confiscating European private investors' holdings within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a key role in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan. Strategic Positioning In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States." Euroclear declined to comment on the new legal action. It has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Legal Hurdles Ahead While judges in European nations are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities indicated they are working on steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." How the Funding Would Work Under the complex plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched. Kyiv would only be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict. Other Funding Ideas Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the European budget. This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."